| |
|
        |
| |
| |
Public Affairs Update
Health disparities are more than a “genetic thing” . . . . Francis Collins, Director
of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), stressed the
importance of taking environmental factors into account when explaining health
disparities across races this month at a national conference on racial and ethnic
health disparities. In the search for explanations of health differences, Collins
warned against relying solely on “muddy and misleading proxies” that genetic
variation and race represent. As an example of the “mixed blessing” wrought by
drugs having differential effects, Collins mentioned the congestive heart failure
treatment BiDil, the first FDA-approved drug designed specifically for blacks.
He pointed out that the drug’s benefits likely are not dependent on race, but
rather, on confounding variables related to the types of disorders different populations
suffer because of non-genetic factors. ASA Past-President Troy Duster
has repeatedly emphasized the danger of marketing drugs to specific races, as
the false message many absorb is that people of different races are biologically
different. National Medical Association President Sandra Gadson said, “If only
genetic factors are considered, only genetic factors will be discovered.” A year
ago, NHGRI added the Social and Behavioral Research Branch, within its Division
of Intramural Research, to increase understanding of complex social and
genetic interactions. At the 2005 ASA Annual Meeting, Vivian Ota Wang, Program
Director of NHGRI’s Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program, spoke
about research opportunities on a panel addressing science funding.
Applications sought for Human and Social Dynamics grants . . . . The National
Science Foundation’s (NSF) priority area in Human and Social Dynamics
(HSD) has announced competitions for FY 2006. This year’s solicitation emphasizes:
Agents of Change; Dynamics of Human Behavior; and Decision Making,
Risk, and Uncertainty. NSF anticipates spending $50 million on more than 100
awards. Full research projects will support multidisciplinary teams of three or
more investigators from at least two different fields in multidisciplinary projects.
Three-year awards of up to $750,000 will be made. Proposals are due February
21, 2006. Support is available also for exploratory research projects to perform
preliminary activities that provide the basis for more elaborate work. NSF will
also fund HSD research community development projects for interdisciplinary
educational activities and other broad-ranging efforts, including research workshops
and training activities. Exploratory research and community development
grants for one or two years, with awards not exceeding $125,000. Proposals are
due February 14, 2006. For more information, see www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=SBE.
Government reports speedier grant review . . . . In December, the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a pilot effort to significantly shorten its
peer reviews of research grant applications to expedite scientists’ research—to
the public’s benefit. The pilot will help new investigators, a promising and vulnerable
group, applying for R01 grants. In early 2006, NIH’s Center for Scientific
Review (CSR), which organizes the evaluative peer review groups, will initiate
the pilot. Details of the proposed pilot are described in the NIH Guide to Grants
and Contracts: grants.nih.gov/grants /guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-013.html. Also, NIH has announced it will begin phasing out paper applications
and appendices. For R01 applications, electronic submission will begin on
October 1, 2006 (see era.nih.gov/ ElectronicReceipt).
Census releases more American Community Survey tables . . . . The U.S. Census
released more than 600 additional base tables from the 2004 American Community
Survey (ACS) in late fall. Included are 258 new base tables. Some new
tables include: median age (by residence one year ago); place of birth (by language
spoken at home and ability to speak English); place of birth (by marital
status); means of transportation to work (by industry); and median monthly housing
costs. A new ACS feature are Subject Tables, which are similar to the Census
2000 Quick Tables but with more detail. Additional data are on the Census
American FactFinder website: factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en.
More organizations accredited for human research . . . . Six organizations—
three academic health centers and three universities—have been recognized by
the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs
(AAHRPP) for their oversight of human research participants. The institutions
receiving full three-year accreditation include Baylor College of Medicine, the
University of California-San Francisco, East Tennessee State University, and the
University of Arizona. Michigan State University and the University of Maryland-
Baltimore earned “qualified” accreditation pending resolution of minor administrative
issues. AAHRPP, launched in 2001 with the support of major academic
and research ethics groups, became the sole organization of its kind when
the Partnership for Human Research Protection announced its closing in 2005.
If only NSF titles were legitimate words in “Scrabble” . . . . The National
Science Foundation (NSF) recently announced that its Science and Technology
Studies (STS) Program and the NSF Societal Dimensions of Engineering, Science,
and Technology (SDEST) Program no longer exist under those titles. The
new, consolidated program title is Science and Society (S&S). The new program
includes the following components: Ethics and Values in Science, Engineering,
and Technology (EVS); History and Philosophy of Science, Engineering, and Technology
(HPS); Social Studies of Science, Engineering, and Technology (SSS); and
Studies of Policy, Science, Engineering, and Technology (SPS). The twice-yearly
target dates for proposals are February 1 and August 1. Program details can be
found at: www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5324&org=SBE&from=home.
|
|