The All-Consuming Life of an
Encyclopedia Editor
by George Ritzer, University of Maryland-
College Park and Editor, The Blackwell
Encyclopedia of Sociology
For several decades, I have edited
various types of books (and a journal).
Usually, editing has been a diversion
from the far more arduous task of
writing. I assumed, when I began, that
editing The Blackwell Encyclopedia of
Sociology would not be much different
from my previous editing of anthologies,
companions, and handbooks. I was also
buoyed by the fact that I edited the less
ambitious Encyclopedia of Social Theory
(only two volumes) in 2005, which was
not much more difficult than previous
editing experiences.
I could not have been more mistaken
about The Encyclopedia of Sociology. As
Georg Simmel pointed out more than a
century agoquantitative differences can turn into qualitative differences.
Dealing with close to 1,800 entries and
a slightly smaller number of authors
made for a very different, and infinitely
more complex, task than I had ever
experienced or imagined. Instead of a set
of tasks completed during breaks from
writing (and teaching), it consumed my
work life, and even my personal life,
for nearly two years. With never-ending
piles of drafts of entries to read (or
re-read), I rarely went anywhere without
a briefcase full of them. My wife grew
weary of the entries constantly in hand.
Divorce, or at least a trial separation,
was threatened more than once. While
I am glad it is over and pleased with
the result. I am not sure I would have
undertaken this Herculean task had I
fully anticipated what was involved, but
in the end I am glad I did.
Why Another Encyclopedia?
There was a clear need for a new
encyclopedia of sociology. The previous
one was published in the early 1990s
with a minor revision in 2000. It not only
was comparatively brief (five volumes),
but was primarily a reflection of a sociology
of an earlier era. A contemporary
encyclopedia that reflected late 20th and
early 21st century sociology was needed.
A longer encyclopedia that dealt with
the discipline in greater breadth (over 30
different areas are covered) and depth
(often, at least 50 entries were written
covering major topics in each of those
areas) was required. This breadth and
depth makes The Blackwell Encyclopedia
of Sociology a near-exhaustive overview
of the state-of-the-art in sociology in the
early 21st century.
A great emphasis was placed on
being absolutely up-to-date by choosing
the latest topics in the field and having
them written by authors intimately
associated with them. However, classical
ideas, theories, methods, and so on were
certainly not ignored. Sociology has not
outgrown its classical roots and it continues
to draw sustenance from them. Thus,
the classical entries are living topics that
inform sociology today.
The willingness of so many sociologists
to contribute to this endeavorfor
little or no economic rewardwas
extraordinary. Of course there were
refusals, and some who did not deliver
their entries on time (and in a few cases
not at all), but the vast majority did what they promised and sometimes much more.
I read all of the entries, sometimes
several times. While daunting, it had its
rewards not only in, I hope, higher-quality
entries, but also in the fact that I learned
about areas of sociology far removed from
my own interests and highly specific topics
about which I knew little or nothing. More
important, I know that readers who spend
only a short time with these entries will
find the experience edifying.
Why Go Online?
The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology
(BEOS) is now a physical reality and,
on the surface, it would seem that my
work on it is completed. However, that
is far from the case as it lives on in BEOS
Online (see www.sociologyencyclopedia.
com/overview.asp). We are well into the
process of creating lists of new entries and
lining up authors to write them. Why new
entries? After all, the bound version of
the Encyclopedia was published only a few
months ago.
First, even the nearly 1,800 entries, 10
volumes (plus an 11th devoted to the index),
6,000 pages, and 3.5 million words do not
come close to exhausting what could be
written about sociology. Second, sociology
continues to develop and expand with new
concepts, ideas, theories, methods, and the
like, and they need to be added to a live
resource. Third, areas already covered by
print entries continue to evolve and need
to be revised and updated to reflect those
changes. Finally, we made a decision to
include entries in the encyclopedia only on
deceased sociologists (based on the belief
that in at least some cases the passage
of time was needed in order to decide
whether inclusion was warranted). As
time passes new possibilities for entries
present themselves on a regular basis.
For example, since the completion of
the bound version of the encyclopedia,
such notables as Jacques Derrida, John
Kenneth Galbraith, Betty Friedan, and
Jean Baudrillard have died. Entries on
these notables (and undoubtedly others)
will be added in regular updates of
BEOS Online.
There is, of course, already a great
deal of information available online
(and elsewhere) on many of the topics
covered in the encyclopedia. Why, then,
should one consult BEOS Online rather
than one or more of these other sources?
For one thing, all entries are vetted by
the Editor and in the case of the original
entries in the bound volume, by an
Advisory Editor, as well. Thus, consulting
BEOS Online gives greater assurance
of the quality of the material found there,
as well as of its accuracy. For another,
each entry is part of a broader and more
systematic treatment of sociology than
is available elsewhere. Thus, it is the
totality of what is available, as well as
the interrelationship of the entries (as
made clear by systematic cross-referencing),
that differentiates The Blackwell
Encyclopedia of Sociology and BEOS
Online, as well as the combination of the
two, from other alternatives on, or off,
the Internet.